iomer internet solutions, a Custom Development Solution Finalist in Microsoft Partner Program IMPACT Awards

One of iomer's many awards

Annual Microsoft Awards recognize Canadian technology partners’ and their commitment and leadership in the channel community

Edmonton, Alberta – iomer internet solutions inc. announced that it has been selected as a finalist in the Custom Development Solutions category for the 2007 Microsoft Partner Program IMPACT Awards. The fifth annual IMPACT Awards recognize excellence within the Microsoft technology partner community in Canada as well as the innovative solutions and value they deliver to customers.

“Microsoft technology partners are the key drivers in delivering ground-breaking solutions that help meet today’s complex customer demands,” said Lora Gernon, Director, Partner Group, Microsoft Canada Co. “iomer has demonstrated commitment and leadership in the industry and the Microsoft Partner Program IMPACT Awards celebrate the company’s achievements and invaluable solutions they have developed to help drive real business growth and customer satisfaction.”

Working with North American Construction Group (NACG) and FleetScout Technologies Incorporated, iomer developed a web-based Mobile Asset Tracking System designed for customers requiring diversified fleet management capabilities. The system combines the use of Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) devices with cellular and satellite digital communication technologies to provide accurate real time location and vehicle status information. The system is device agnostic and currently integrates with multiple asset interfaces allowing customers to leverage existing investments in GPS and cellular infrastructure.

NACG’s release of FleetScout provides Automated Vehicle Location (AVL) services for both light and heavy equipment, allowing users to view current asset location and performance including fuel usage, mileage travelled, speed and heading, and other critical asset performance indicators along with extensive historical reporting.

The FleetScout solution makes extensive use of a variety of Microsoft technologies, including the Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 with ASP.NET AJAX 1.0 extensions, Microsoft Virtual Earth, Microsoft SQL Server 2005 and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007.

iomer internet solutions inc., along with other technology partner winners and finalists in each of the award categories, will be honored at a gala event in Toronto on November 1, 2007.

About the Microsoft Partner Program IMPACT Awards

In 2003, Microsoft Canada replaced all of its previous technology partner awards with a unified program that also recognizes customer service, marketing, and contribution to the community. Microsoft Canada has outlined 30 categories to highlight the Partner Program competencies to honour the achievements of top technology partners.

The Microsoft Partner Program IMPACT Awards were open to Systems Integrators, Large Account Resellers, Direct Market Resellers, Value Added Resellers, Distributors, Systems Builders, Authorized Education Resellers, Certified Partners for Learning Solutions, Microsoft Certified Partners, Independent Software Vendors, Channel Suppliers, Microsoft Business Solutions (MBS) Partners and Original Equipment Manufacturers.

For a list of all 2007 finalists, and more information on the Microsoft Partner Program IMPACT Awards, please visit http://www.microsoft.ca/awards.

About iomer internet solutions inc.

iomer enables organizations to improve business operations with emerging technology. We solve traditional business challenges through our three key practice areas: Strategic Advisory, Solution Development, and User Experience and Design.

For more information, press only:
Sam Jenkins
Director, Marketing and Business Development
(780) 424-3122
sam.jenkins@iomer.com

For more information on Microsoft Partner Program IMPACT Awards only, please contact: Donna Araujo
High Road Communications
(416) 644-2283
daraujo@highroad.com


Something to Write Home About
A Guide to Writing for the Web

Transition from paper-based writing to writing for an online audience.

Sam Jenkins, iomer internet solutions inc.

The difference between paper and the Web

For many writers, the transition from paper-based writing to writing for an online audience can be a difficult shift. In print, a document tends to be part of a larger entity, where the user is not necessarily focused on the entire set – for example, a textbook or a curriculum guide. On the web, however, each document is independent, and linked to other independent documents via hyperlinks. With a printed resource, a writer can assume that the reader will follow a linear path to find his or her information, whereas with a web resource, that same reader can follow any number of paths to find their outcome

A user on the web can enter a site through any page on the site, either through the traditional navigation, through a link passed from a colleague or through a search engine query. This increases the important for an independent, rather than holistic, view of a website. Assume that your reader knows little about what has been explained or documented in previous pages.

While this does not necessarily mean provide every ounce of information about the topic on every page, but it does mean that it is vital to provide links to other pages of interest within the content, to provide a contextual view of the information presented.

How readers act on the Web

As important as viewing each page as an independent entity is the understanding of the nature of readers on the web. On the web, users tend to be impatient. “They have not chosen your site because you are great, but because they have something they need to do.”

Readers don’t read on the web – they scan the webpage, picking out individual words and phrases. Studies show that 79% of readers on the web scan content on the web, while only 16% read word for word.

Today’s web pages have to employ scannable text in order to be useful for the audience:

  • Highlight keywords within the content to draw attention to important elements within your content. While a hypertext link acts as one form of highlighting, successful highlighting techniques include the use of bold and italic typefaces.
  • Use meaningful sub-headings for your H1, H2 and H3 tags. Most users scan content to find the sub-headings which match the content for which they are looking for. By properly using these elements, you can help your users find the information that they are so desperately seeking.
  • Use bulleted and numbered lists to display related content, or order to draw attention to the groupings. You can include a greater number of lists on a web page than on a printed paper page, but ensure that these lists are limited to no more than two levels.
  • Discuss one topic per paragraph – users will skip over any additional ideas that are not described in the first few words of a paragraph.
  • Adapt an inverted pyramid style of writing by placing your concluding thoughts at the beginning of the document. This enables your reader to judge the value of the content right away.
  • Use half the word count of conventional writing.

Credibility and the Web

Years ago, users tended to (incorrectly) assume that content that they discovered on the web was completely valid. Unlike print resources, publishing to the web is fast and cheap. Today, however, it is found that credibility is very important for web users, since most users are aware that it is unclear who is behind information on the Web and whether a page can be trusted.

It is important to communicate the trustworthiness of the resources being presented on the web, through a variety of methods:

  1. Design quality: In the context of a professional look-and-feel, a web user can find comfort in the context of the information being presented.
  2. Comprehensive, correct and current information means that users can enjoy the currency of information, with faith in the source.
  3. Connected to the rest of the Web: By providing hyperlinks to other (trusted) sources, the author can generate a sense of confidence by the reader. An isolated site “feel[s] like they have something to hide” .

Writing Style

The Web is an informal and immediate medium, compared to print, so users appreciate a somewhat information writing style – with a limited amount of humour. Avoid the user of clever or cute headings, since users rely heavily on scanning of headings to pick up the meaning of the text. Limit the user of metaphors, particularly in headers: users may take the meaning seriously. Use simple sentence structures: convoluting writing and complex words are even harder to understand online – reading via computer screen is 25% slower than from a paper equivalent.

In order to promote the credibility of the information, avoid the use of “marketese” and industry specific buzzwords and acronyms. Instead, use objective language paired with a scannable layout. By avoiding promotional language, the reader can spend less resources filtering hyperbole to get at the facts, and to avoid distraction.

Linking to other information

It is a good rule of thumb to avoid a hyperlink to another resource of that information can be succinctly presented on the current page, however, if a link is required, use a description of the information to be found in the link, or the link address, rather than “click here”. By placing a link ‘in context’ of the information being provided, it provides a more comfortable user experience for the reader.

Writing for Search Engines

More and more, users are relying on search engines, both internally and externally, to find information about their desired topic. Even today, more than half of web users use a search engine to navigate a website.

When users link to a page from a search engine, they should know immediately how the page relates to their query – highlighting the value of placing your conclusion at the top of the page.

Optimizing your content for search engines should be a regular process for all new content posted to the web. On every page, ensure that you include all possible query terms in context of your information. By using standard terms, as well as synonyms, a search engine will be able to correctly classify your information and produce the correct results for a reader.

As well, be sure to include keywords and a description as a part of the page’s metadata, providing a parameter from which a search engine can begin its classification of the information. This, coupled with a title that would make sense when viewed completely out of context of the page, users will not be disappointed when clicking on your page when browsing via search engine.

Writing for Lower Literacy Users

Lower literacy users exhibit very different reading behaviours than higher-literacy users: they plow text rather than scan it, and they miss page elements due to a narrower field of view. Lower literacy is different than illiteracy: people with lower literacy can read, but have difficulty doing so. This can include children, teenagers or adults with English as a second language.

Unlike a higher literacy users, a lower literacy user cannot scan text. As a result, a user with a lower understand of English will not quickly glance at text; however, they will completely skip over large amounts of text when things become too complicated.

In order to provide an optimal experience for this specialized segment, it is important to follow a few key rules of thumb:

  • Prioritize information, and place the main point (and conclusion) at the top of the page. By placing essential information above the page fold (so the user does not have to scroll to find more), there is a reduced risk in breaking the user’s concentration.
  • Avoid text that moves or changes, such as animations or flyouts. A piece of static text is much easier to grasp. This rule of thumb also helps users with motor skill impairments.
  • Optimize search: ensure that the internal search engine, as well as any meta keywords, is tolerant of misspellings and synonyms.

Sam Jenkins is a Solution Manager with iomer internet solutions inc. He is an experienced interaction designer specializing in information architecture, business analysis and technology advisory. Contact us for more information on how your business can use the web as an effective marketing medium.

Nielsen, Jakob et al. “Writing for the Web”. http://www.sun.com/980713/webwriting/ (accessed April 3, 2006).
Nielsen, Jakob. “How Users Read on the Web”. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9710a.html (accessed April 3, 2006)
Nielsen, Jakob. “Trustworthiness in Web Design”. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990307.html (accessed April 3, 2006)
Nielsen, Jakob et al. “Writing for the Web”. http://www.sun.com/980713/webwriting/ (accessed April 3, 2006).
Nielsen, Jakob et al. “Writing to be Found”. http://www.sun.com/980713/webwriting/wftw6.html (accessed April 3, 2006).
Nielsen, Jakob. “Low-Literacy Users”. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050314.html (accessed April 3, 2006)